More on Revaluation

Many of us on the City Council have heard quite a bit about revaluation, both in the public wherever we happen to be, and in emails. Below is a good sample of some that I've received, and a response from the City Manager. (I replied directly as well, but I thought Larry's was a good answer worth sharing). For privacy's sake, I removed personal identification of the writer, other than his first name.

The City Council continues to assess what steps can be taken to soften the overall effect of the revaluation, from phase-in, to spending actions, to increased economic development opportunities. As always, your input and ideas are welcome. Please share at our email addresses found on the City's website .

Subject: Mill Rate and assessments

Mayor Benigni and Mr Kendzior and City Council Members,

I am writing this letter as a result of the recently received reassessments of the homes in Meriden and the running commentary in the Record Journal about the mill rate. First let me start by saying that I was alarmed by the amount of the increase in the assessment value of my home. I also find it very strange that the assessment increased so much in a housing market that is beginning its decline. Meriden has always been a reasonably priced place to live, however, the assessments and the proposed 30% mill rate will make that no longer a reality.

Let me explain. For the working class person with a family of four, the average increase will be somewhere between $100-$150 per month. Where do you propose that the money comes from? The only really acceptable mill rate is somewhere between 20-22. That would afford a minimal increase in the residents taxes and would be understandable. At a 30 Mill rate the increase is almost a 25% increase on property taxes per year! I would also like to know what additional services we will be getting if that 30% Mill Rate is applied. Will we not have to pay for bulky waste any more? Will the overcrowded classrooms become less? Will you finish the sidewalk all the way up Liberty Street since I was told that you ran out of money for that project for this year? Will the city be cleaner?

What happens when we run out of money and can’t pay our taxes? Is there no penalty for us like there is no penalty for the city not servicing the residents when they run out of money for things? I think not.

I ask you as a citizen of the city to look at that mill rate very carefully. 30% is by no means a bargain to live in this city. I have heard and seen people throwing around that number with a smile. We as residents of Meriden are not smiling about that, or the proposed increases. We are not receiving any more benefits than we have and now we will have to pay 25% more to live here. In a declining housing market and a tough economy, you would be making it very easy for us to leave (and leave quickly) the city and pay taxes to a smaller town that keeps their expenses in check and does not make the residents who live, work, shop etc in their communities pay through the nose to help pay for budget shortfalls that are attributed the government of the city, not necessarily the residents.

I look forward to you re-visiting these issues and making a favorable decision for the residents of this city.

Brian, Meriden Taxpayer

___________________________

Dear Brian-

Thank you for your well written note. The impact of revaluation is a serious concern to all of us as residents and taxpayers, and to all city officials and staff. As someone with responsibility for setting City policy, it is good to hear from concerned citizens like yourself.

State law requires that all classes of real property be revalued every five years. The change in your assessment's a change from the last revaluation in 2001. The impact of each revaluation depends on the relative change in real estate values among the different classes of property: residential, commercial and industrial. In 2001 commercial and industrial values increased at a greater rate than residential values, and as a result a greater portion of the overall local tax burden was shifted onto owners of business property, and residential owners were impacted very little. That revaluation went into effect with very little public notice for that reason.

In 2006, the situation is different. Residential values rose in the period from 2001 to 2006 at a rate that is almost twice that of commercial property and five times that of industrial property. The new assessments reflect actual sales data taken over a 2 1/2 year period, right up to the end of September, 2006. Although the housing market in Meriden has slowed, the sales data reflects only a small decrease in the last two months. The trend was taken into consideration, and the new assessment for residential properties sold during the period when that sales data was collected average seven percent less than the actual sales.

However, the relatively greater increase in residential values does cause a shift in the tax burden, one that is not taken lightly. While we will not know what the new mill rate will be until after all the assessment appeals are heard and the list of taxable property, including motor vehicle and business property figure which are not yet available, is finalized, and we are able to estimate the amount of state revenue and other revenues the City will receive, and decisions on the budget are made, it is clear that the percentage of the local tax bill paid by residential owners will increase and the portion paid by commercial and industrial property owners, and motor vehicle owners, will decrease, on average.

This occurs even if local taxes are not raised as a whole. At 28.25 mills, assuming that the motor vehicle and business property part of the tax list remains the same, every extra dollar paid by a residential owner is offset by a dollar decrease to commercial, industrial, motor vehicle and business property owners. In other words, revaluation does not result in additional revenue or result in increased spending., even though it causes the tax bill of residential owners to increase on average.

The impact of revaluation is something that the Mayor, City Council and city staff have been concerned about for some time, and we have tried to take steps with regard to expenses to offset that impact to the extent possible. The cost of the amount authorized for city projects paid from bonding was cut by half two years ago and is proposed to be cut by half again this year. The wage increase negotiated with our employee bargaining units have been lowest ever, and employees pay a greater share of their health care costs than ever before. Positions have gone unfilled, filled at a lower rate of pay, and departments reorganized to decrease wage costs, which are the primary city expense. (Italics mine. STZ)

I'm quite sure that this year the examination of the proposed budget will be even more intense. However, just like homeowners, some City expenses, like electricity, gas, gasoline, heating oil, and health care, increase despite our best efforts. Steps that we have taken have lessened the rate of increase of those types of expenses, but the absolute costs still have risen.

At this point, it appears you are taking the proper step of making sure that your own assessment reflects the value of your property. I did take a look at your assessment, and the increase is somewhat less than the average residential increase, but you should ensure that the revaluation company has all its information on your home correct and bring to their attention any appraisal information you may have or information on the sale of similar sized homes in your neighborhood. A quick check of the change in your tax situation, assuming your assessment on your home and motor vehicles doesn't change, and using the revenue neutral mill rate of 28.25, shows that your annual tax bill would increase by approximately $370 for the year. That is not an insubstantial amount, but it is less than the $100-150 a month mentioned in your note. Of course, all of those numbers are only estimates until the budget is set.

There are options allowed by law to phase in the new assessment numbers over more than one year, and I know that the City Council will be examining those very carefully. We do need to lessen the impact of revaluation on residential owners as much as possible, but at the same time there has to be equity for owners of other kinds of property whose taxes would otherwise decrease. Once you are satisfied that you have done what you can to ensure that your assessment correctly reflects your property value, and as the budget hearing process goes forward, you have the opportunity to offer your ideas and thoughts on the level of spending necessary to maintain those essential services you mentioned, and I am confident that the Mayor and Council will be paying attention, particularly this budget year.

Lawrence J. Kendzior

Meriden City Manager

Christmas in the Village

A little history from one of the founders of this popular annual event, one that is growing in popularity each year. It represents what people can do when they get together as a community.

Christmas in the Village 2006
By Keith Gordon

8^th Annual Christmas in the Village will take place on Saturday December 2, 2006.

Christmas in the Village started over a cup of coffee and a Snapple at Tom’s Place. Tom Caliendo, owner of Tom’s, and myself were talking about how we could bring some additional unity back to the Village of South Meriden. We decided to have a yearly Christmas in the Village celebration not knowing if it would take off and continue. It took off and it has been continuing each year even though we did get snowed out around three years ago. Tom and I started to talk to other stake holders in the Village, i.e., business, neighborhood leaders, churches, schools, South Meriden Fire and our community police officers. Well, we put it together, and the first year we had over 600 attend. The event now brings over 2,000 each year to the Village where neighbors greet neighbors, friends meet friends, and newcomers come and meet new friends and families come together to enjoy the sprit of the holidays.
We open the event with the Santa parade at 2:00 p.m. led by the Washington Drum Corp and a host of seasonal personalities. Santa is then stationed at The Fire Station where children get the opportunity to sit with Santa and tell him their holiday requests and get their pictures taken. Kellie and Sean Moore provide holiday music and sing-alongs from the beginning to the end at the fire station, along with face painting which is provided to all who choose to enjoy the art of Ruth Gordon from Fantasy faces by Ruth. For the past two years we have had Meriden Police crime prevention officer Tom Cirillo and his assistant doing AMBER Alert registration at the fire station. Also this registration helps keep our children safe and is a free service.
South Meriden Trinity United Methodist has a children’s bazaar and games, and New Life Church this year will have a Living Nativity and goodies to munch on.
If everything goes correctly Hanover School will have its annual holiday book sale also.
The Main stage has entertainment happening during the event with master of ceremonies Ralph Riello giving away numerous gift items. There is the world’s best baked cinnamon apples stationed at Data Link Corp. located at Main and Camp Street, manned by Jim Cournoyer and Ed Haberli and crew. We have popcorn, chestnuts, cider, candy and hot chocolate. There are games and arts and crafts. The Meriden Library book mobile is out on Main Street also. We also have participation from the stores on Main Street, Deb’s Deli, Panda House, our New Karate School, Pet Parlor, Canine Training School, and the South Meriden Package Store. The two horse drawn wagons travel around the Village giving scenic rides, letting people off at several stops along the way.
Hanover School students supply the artwork decoration for the storefront windows, and the Christmas in the Village committee decorates the streetlights with seasonal wreaths that have been purchased by the committee.
South Meriden Volunteer Fire Fighters handle the Bon Fire each year that is located at the Riverside Park on Main Street. The Christmas tree at Riverside Park will be lit by a student from Hanover School while seasonal songs are song with Mr. and Mrs. Santa a little after 5:00 p.m.

Revaluation

The revaluation notices have been sent out. I will tell you, my eyebrows raised as much as everyone else's when I saw the increased assessment. I've been getting an earful in my wanderings around the city, and I know my fellow Councilors have been getting the same. We knew there would be a lot of anger and complaints over the values. Yet, the City must go forth, as revaluation is a state-mandated task, for all towns and Cities.

Because it only happens once every four years, (it used to be 10!), people forget the intent and process. That's why we asked the City Manager to have the City Assessor, Mike Modarski, to give a presentation at a recent City Council meeting. He also wrote an op-ed in the Record Journal, to give folks a bit of a heads up.

Doesn't matter. People are still upset, and I can't blame them. I did respond to an emailer through the City website with the following, trying to give some answers as I know them at this time:

HI, (E-mailer), thank you for your note, and it's not the first nor last that the City Council will be hearing on the matter of revaluation. It's one of the reasons we had the City Assessor give an overview of the process a couple Council meetings ago, and also had him write an op-ed, to help prepare and educate Meriden's citizens. Clearly, we have more work to do in this regard.

Revaluation is a jarring event for most home owners, but a necessary (and state-mandated) task the City must undergo every four years. It's even more daunting given the increase in market values of property in those past few years, the most being in residential values. The last revaluation saw the bigger hit on commercial properties. The purpose of revaluation is to "even" out and make fair property assessments against benchmarks that take into account current market values of similar properties. But I know it's hard to accept when you don't "see" the value of your home rising so fast on a regular basis. On the other hand, would you accept the current assessment number (figured at 70% of market value) as a reasonable offer on your house? You'd most likely be insulted.

What you're seeing is the first part of the process, the re-setting of your home's assessment value to bring it to current levels. The other critical component is the adustment of the mill rate, downward, which in theory provides a revenue-neutral figure for overall taxation purposes. However, that theory gets adjusted for a number of variables, and that's where it gets sticky for everyone. Our City Manager was posed some of the questions you asked on expected tax increases. Here was Larry Kendzior's response:

"I'm hesitant to identify a mill rate because that rate could change dramatically if the Council adopts a phase in, and different phase in plans would have different effects. I also don't want to be held to a specific rate without some idea of where the budget is headed. The other problem is that any projection on the mill rate is dependant on the final grand list number, which will change even more than usual because the Board of Assessment Appeals will undoubtedly lower many assessments. But we can certainly emphasize that the mill rate will be substantially reduced."

As you can see, the City Council and administration still have a lot of work to do, not only with the budget bu also we need to know where the grand list will land, and that information won't be known for some time. I know this may not serve to calm your nerves, but I ask that you be patient, and let the process go forth. As your notice said, there are appeals available, but until all the info is gathered, final answers can't be given just yet.

One positive note that rarely gets mentioned, however: motor vehicle taxes will be reduced as they will be assessed against that same lowered mill rate. Perhaps not enough to offset any tax increase due to revaluation, but it's something.

I hope I helped here a little, at least in information.

I'll be asking the City Manager to provide updates about revaluation from time to time as part of his report to the City Council at the end of our meeting. We have a lot to do on this. And I look forward to your comments.

This Land is Our Land....

This press release went out at 6 pm today:

"City Councilors Brian F. Kogut and Stephen T. Zerio, members of the Meriden City Council’s Ad Hoc Power Plant Committee, announced today that the transfer of approximately 357 acres of land located in Meriden has taken place. The closing on the property, resulting in the land transfer to the City of Meriden, took place on October 19, 2006 between the City of Meriden and Meriden Gas Turbines (MGT), the owner of the power plant site. It is expected that the land transfer documents will be recorded in the office of the Meriden City Clerk tomorrow, October 20. 2006. The 357 acres are in Meriden and are located around the power plant site and property around Beaver Pond. MGT is retaining the land on which the power plant is located.

“I’d like to credit the efforts of my fellow committee members, Brian Kogut and former City Councilor Joseph Ferrigno Feest, Mayor Benigni, the City Council and the local state delegation for their patience and persistence in working to see this important land transfer finalized after so many years,” said Zerio, the ad hoc committee chairman. “The City also owes a special thanks to the CT Siting Council and the Office of State Attorney General Richard Blumenthal. The Siting Council took extraordinary steps in directing NRG to meet its original commitments, with cooperation from the Attorney General. We’d still be waiting for this day to happen without their strong support.”

“The transfer of the 357 acres to the City of Meriden was a condition of the original power plant approval,” said Kogut. “It has taken very long time and I am happy that the transfer has finally been concluded.”

The transfer of the land to the City of Meriden by MGT was the subject of an enforcement action brought by the CT Siting Council against MGT to require that the land be transferred to the City of Meriden. The City was represented by the law firm of Brown Rudnick, Associate City Attorney Deborah L. Moore and City Manager Lawrence J. Kendzior. That action was settled in January, 2006. As part of that settlement, the City of Meriden was allowed to undertake a complete environmental review of the property.

BACKGROUND

PDC-El Paso Meriden applied to the CT Siting Council for a Certificate to build a 544 MW natural gas-fired combined cycle plant in the City of Meriden on August 27, 1998. The Siting Council approved the request on April 27, 1999, with the requirement that approximately 357 acres of excess land surrounding the power plant site located in the City of Meriden be donated to the City of Meriden. PDC-El Paso was later acquired by Meriden Gas Turbines (MGT) and its parent company NRG in December, 2001. According to Siting Council records, MGT suspended construction on the plant approximately two years later.

The CT Siting Council, through the Office of the Attorney General, initiated an enforcement action against MGT and its parent company NRG in CT Superior Court in August, 2005 seeking the transfer of the land to the City of Meriden. The Superior Court approved the settlement between the Siting Council, MGT and the City of Meriden (as a party of interest to the proceedings) in January, 2006. As part of the settlement agreement, the City of Meriden undertook a thorough and comprehensive environmental review of the property."

Great news for the City. Although there have been concerns and opponents of this project, to date the City has received over $11 million in undisputed tax payments, and now 357 new acres in the north part of our city, a tremendous addition to a land poor municipality. I've been asked what the City's plans are for the property, and my response is it's not going anywhere, there's no rush. We should just savor the moment.

Council Roundup

First, let me thank the stalwart few that have kept checking in on this blog over the past 3 months. Although there have been no new posts, people are still looking in, and I'm happy about that. And today I even got a response to an old post about bulky waste. (Check it out in the Bulky Waste post).


The City Council is working on a number of actions, projects and initiatives as Fall hits its peak. These are just a few:

• Finalizing plans for demolishing the Hub in late October, paving the way for a greenspace, flood control improvements, and opportunities for economic development;
• Concluding the sale of 55 West Main St, improving a key corner with commercial space, artist housing, and the continuance of the Castle Craig Playhouse;
• The restructure of the Public Works and Parks and Recreation Department to allow more accountability and efficiency;
• Planning phase II of the Linear Trail, linking the Gorge by Red Bridge through Dossin Beach onto West Main St;
• Considering becoming the first City in Connecticut to call for and support actions by the General Assembly in achieving Universal Health Care for all;
• Awaiting the results of the committee looking to rebuild Falcon Field within the budgetary limits given ($2 million from the State, $2 million from the City);
• Preparing for the effects of revaluation of property in the coming year.

There is much more, but you can see the Councilors are busy. How are we doing?

Catch up.

I know, I know...where have I been?

Well, it is summer, and Council and committee meetings have been reduced (one wag said everytime we cancel a meeting we save the City $1 million!). Our house is in shambles due to long overdue remodeling as a result of water damage over a year ago; my paying job is in the middle of its busy season; and weekends are devoted to my daughter's softball team. So it's been hard to hit the blog of late, but I haven't forgotten it.

The best news we've recently received was an increase from Moody's for our bond rating, to A3 from Baa1. This is basically a financial report card which states to municipal investors that Meriden is not only financially sound, but with a solid future. It also means our taxpayers save money when the City does have to obtain financing for capital projects (street repair, building improvements, school construction...and yes, Falcon Field). I'm very pleased with this rating, which dropped several years ago. It's been one of my goals on the Finance Committee to see it return to this level, and this goal has been achieved. Now we need to maintain it, and seek to improve it once more in the future.

The Council approved the sale of property (the old Hanover House and adjacent lots) on Hanover St last week, as a result of placing it on the open market from one of our "on rotation" realtors. It happened to be Maier Real Estate who handled the sale, and yes, it's owned by one of the councilors, Sandy Maier Schede. However, she abstained from all discussion, debate, and voting on anything to do with this piece of property (she herself did not represent the City in the sale; one of the brokers in her office did) as the Code of Ethics requires. Nevertheless, the losing bidder, and some members of the public, would like to imply that this was a "shady" deal. It was not, and I will spend some time in a future post to explain how the City acquires and disposes of property...all with an approved process.

I'm amazed at the dialogue occuring regarding Councilors Lynes' and Santiago discussion on bilingual signs aimed at controlling litter. Both women may have their own point of view, but the piling on regarding what languages are on signs is frankly distracting everyone from the real issue: people are littering in the City, making it look a mess, and spitting in the eye of personal responsibility. The Golden Rule, 'Do unto others as you would have others do unto you' is known in all languages, and really shouldn't even need a sign. Come on, pick up after yourselves! And special kudos to the woman I saw early last Sunday morning, obviously on her walking exercise regime, with a plastic bag in her hand. She traversed apace south on Bee St, and east on East Main, all the while stopping periodically to pick up a can, stray piece of paper, or small bit of trash as she moved forward. I lost track of her by Dunkin Donuts, but I looked back, and the street was litter-free. And I know she didn't think anyone was watching. But I'm real glad she lives in Meriden.

If everybody did a little of what that walking woman did every day, we wouldn't need any signs...and people would have to find something else to pick on Patty and Hilda about.

Soap Box

We're back. It's been a busy month in our family, and time and family, work and Council activities hasn't let me post for a bit. Nevertheless, a few stalwarts have been sending in notes, and I appreciate that. I'll try to post more and respond better in the next few weeks.

The City is picking up some overdue expenses of the Humane Society, which provides the City a needed service in animal control, but has suffered from board turnovers and policies that work against them. How would you improve this situation?

The estimates for the Falcon Field project came in, at $5.6 million. The reaction of the Council was: no way! The Finance Committee, after much study and public input, did agree and recommend to the Council to support up to $2 million to match the State grant. We frankly can't believe the planners didn't pay attention to that limit of $4 million. The Finance Committe will take the matter up this Thursday. This councilor will not be supporting any increase.

The Bicentennial festivities are starting to heat up. I hope all of Meriden partakes in some of the excellent events planned. Let's really be proud of our 200 years and show it at the parade.

What's on your mind about the City?

The Soap Box

Well, as a recent poster noted, it's gotten pretty boring around here. The budget is done, the Daffodil Fest is over, the softball fields are open, the cops are on the street, and the mayor and his wife have had their new baby.

So time to put out the soap box and see what's on your mind.

Meriden's Budget, 2006-07

The City Council will be voting tomorrow night on the budget recommended by the Finance Committee. Barring any major changes proposed and debated on the floor, this budget will produce an increase of 1.99 mills, or an overall tax increase of just under 5%. A good portion of this increase, near 78%, is due to increases in education and public safety. Increased cost of health care, and energy increases are also significant cost drivers.

The BOE is receiving a little over $2 mllion from last year's original approved amount, a large amount no doubt, less in percentage than recent years. (Last year's appropriation was adjusted up due to a return of a part of the BOE's surplus, but this figure was not used as a "base.").The committee considered the excess paid to ACES for Edison School tuition, both in the current fiscal year and the proposed budget request for FY2006-07. The Finance Committee also factored in an expected increase of funds to come from the State for both special education and increased energy expenses. If the State does not grant these funds to the BOE, the Finance Committee will need to consider other appropriations for these costs to the BOE.

One of the few areas where the Finance Committee increased the City Manager's recommended budget was in the Police Department. Based on a recommendation from Council leadership, an increase of $170,000 to the Police overtime budget was inserted. This amount was approved by the Finance Committee as a necessary expense to increase the operations of the Crime Suppression Unit, in order not only to suppress crime in our inner city, but also to prevent it. The Finance Committee also added in $30,000 to assist funding of next year's Daffodil Festival, a line item that was not funded in the City Manager's recommended budget. Although this year's event enjoyed superior weather and crowds, which will raise funds for all involved, it is important that the City continue its support for this signature event.

This is my 11th budget since first elected to the Council. They get tougher every year, and I hear the constituents' pleas to cut. Unfortunately, the "Big Idea" for cutting taxes was not forthcoming, either by the City Manager, the Finance Committee, or the public. Unfortunately, the costs of government are impacted by many areas where we do not have control. The War on Terrorism, Katrina rebuilding, an unstable energy environment, and the Bush Administration's tax cuts all seem to require that the Federal Government decrease appropriation to the states. The states in turn must decrease the level of fundings to the municipalities, without reducing previous mandated legislation from both the federal and state level that cities and towns must implement. The ones left at the bottom of the hill are the local property owners, you and me. I pay the taxes too, and wish there were a way to reduce them. At best, we were able to minimize the increase. And next year brings revaluation....

HB 5525 and the City's Power Plant

On a separate front involving the power plant that is yet to be completed in Meriden, there is a bill in the General Assembly that, among other things, would allow the regulated utilities, (read CL&P, UI) to re-enter the energy generation market, one that was de-regulated several years ago to improve efficiencies and stabilize rates. In reading the bill, I think this section is detrimental to Meriden, in that it would forestall and perhaps eliminate the completion of this plant, one that was allowed in the first place for the taxes it would generate, and the land that would be transferred to the City. After a long hard-fought battle, it appears the land will be Meriden's soon. With this bill, however, the tax part of the deal is now in danger. I wrote the following email to our delegation and copied the Council tonight.

It is my understanding that this bill, "An Act Establishing an Energy and Technology Authority" contains provisions that could be detrimental to Meriden. If approved as proposed, it could seriously delay and even suspend the completion of the independent power project in Meriden currently owned by NRG. (Detailed status on the bill can be tracked here).
.

Specifically, allowing the regulated utilities back into the generation business will upset the capital markets that have financed existing efforts by the private sector since energy deregulation was implemented, and will increase ,not decrease rates. Currently, private investors have several billion dollars invested in generation in CT as designed by de-regulation. The incremental re-regulation envisioned in HB 5525 will serve to put all of those assets at greater risk in the market. Lenders will respond as they always do by requiring higher return for their investment. Cost of debt service will increase at the vast majority of the plants in CT.

Consequently, allowing regulated utilities back into generation will cause the cost of capital for proposed approved projects, not only in Meriden, but also Oxford and Middletown, to increase to the point that they cannot be competitive. The result is they will not be built now or ever. Meriden's reason to allow its plant to be built was to assure a strong and increasing tax revenue over time. Passage of this bill will negate Meriden's efforts to accomplish that goal.

Another part of the bill, as I understand it, specifically excludes natural gas as a fuel for a plant proposed under the RFP. (Meriden's plant is designed to be fueled by natural gas, which is why it was located where it is, near the Algonquin Gas Line). It mandates that coal, utilized as fuel for an IGCC plant, be the only fuel allowed. This despite the fact that integrated gasification combined cycle technology (IGCC) is not a competitive source of energy and cannot be financed without a placing most of the risk (as much as two billion dollars of risk in the bill) on rate payers. Financial markets / lenders will not underwrite an unproven technology, constructors will not guarantee operation or performance and component manufacturers will not guarantee more than their individual component's operation. The risk of technology failure rests on rate payers. $2,000,000,000.00 of risk! I strongl believe that the state's rate payers, if asked, would pass on that risk. They are relying on their legislators to make that decision for them.

Buddy, I know you voted for this in committee, and there are parts of the bill that make sense for the state, I'm sure. But I think the delegation should work to remove language that allows the re-entry of the regulated utilities into the generation business, one the state was compelled to de-regulate because they were not efficient when they DID generation before, and let the private markets do their job when the energy industry and its financing stabilizes. Otherwise, Meriden will have a mausoleum on its hillside, instead of a tax generator.

Thanks for considering this long post. I do not speak for the City Council, but am copying them as they should be interested in how this bill could reduce the possibility of future tax revenues they worked hard to obtain, over a difficult 6 years.

This is one of those issues discussed at the State level which isn't sexy, but could have a real impact on our City in the long run. A lot of money is on the table surrounding energy (just consider what it is costing us to heat our homes, light our rooms, and fuel our cars, and the punishing changes occuring there on a daily basis, not just monthly or yearly). A lot of Meriden's future revenue is on the table with this bill, and we need to make sure Meriden's interests are protected. What do you think?

NRG Land Transfer update

The City Manager advised City Council leadership yesterday that we are one step closer to obtaining the land owed to the City by NRG. The City is due approximately 330 acres as part of an agreement with NRG when they received approval to build a power plant on the former Summitwood property. Earlier this year the State Attorney General's office filed an injunction on behalf of the Siting Council to enforce their order given in 1999 to complete the transfer. (see the 1/14/06 R-J article reporting on the AG and Siting Council's action here.).

The City has completed its environmental assessment and title search as part of the agreement and will formally request the transfer from NRG next week. At that point, according to the agreement, NRG has 60 days to transfer the land. NRG has a number of encumbrances to remove, but that should not forestall the transfer, otherwise the Siting Council can take further action, including revoking NRG's permits for the power plant. That action could have severe financial consequences for NRG, and not in their best business interests.

Once again, the City has done what has been required, as we have ever since the power plant project began. It is time for NRG to complete their part of the deal.

Bulky Waste

It's been a little quiet here, so I thought it might be time for a new poll.

The mayor and Councilor David Salafia submitted a resolution last week for consideration by the Finance Committee. They recommend that citizens who are current with their tax payments be allowed two free drop offs at the landfill. Currently, payments must be made when dropping off any bulky waste: $20 per carload, $40 per truckload, each time a dropoff is made. For the past two years, this service has undergone a lot of debate during the budget vote. It is a large ticket item in the budget, and when trying to cut costs, it's an easy target to eliminate. But it's a service that many residents expect and use. Take the unofficial poll and let us know how you feel. Remember, it's not a scientific, statistically valid exercise, but it will be interesting. And, if you have better ideas, post them here in the comment section. Who knows, your suggestions may be implemented.

Council Meeting Roundup: 4/3/06

Last night's meeting was proceeded by a Special Finance Committee meeting, which took up the matters of public hearings for both the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the Falcon Field project. With the exception of the usual rant and rave of Frank Rotella (yes, he's back after a lengthy vacation courtesy of the State), virtually all speakers approved of the City spending for the proposed sports complex. Even Arline Dunlop jumped on board the bandwagon, with a challenge to all the old jocks to have an Old Timers game on the turf field. Not a bad idea, but I'm not paying the liability premium! The bond resolutions passed, both in committee and ultimately on the Council floor, after extended discussion on the cost analysis prepared by the City Manager at my request. After all is said and done, the net cost to the City would be about $400,000, when taking into account the cost avoidance of upgrades to grass fields at Ceppa, and bleacher/press boxes at Ceppa and Falcon, as well as field maintanance savings. With the increased usage expected for football, soccer, band competitions and Washington Middle School's students, this is a good deal. We'll await the final costs once the design and plans are prepared and bid out. The expected total cost is estimated at $3.3 million at this stage, with 50% coming from the State.

The CIP was approved, (including seed money for the Hubbard Park playscape), but still below the Council's self-imposed bonding cap. The goal here over time is to pay for capital improvements out of operating funds, instead of paying interest. It is a conservative and fiscally prudent path to follow, but takes discipline to manage the costs.

On the Economic Development side, the Council approved a zoning regulation change that will eliminate building homes in rear lots. The intent is to deter unnecessary over-development and reduce density in residential areas. Public safety was also a concern, as fire equipment often cannot reach buildings in rear locations. It is a good change for Meriden. The Council also approved the City to dispose by sale certain properties downtown on Main Street. Currently, they house tenants including Castle Craig Theatre and Kitchens by Glen. The Council directed that appraisals be conducted to determine a market price, and then have several proposals that had been solicited to be considered. It is my hope that any successful proposal include plans to keep the theater intact, and that market-based housing be developed on the upper level. More to come.

The police and fire budget will be considered this Thursday evening at City Hall. Come one, come all.

Budget Cutting:BOE

Well, it's apparent that there aren't many ideas surrounding the City budget. OK, time to unleash the hounds regarding solid ideas in reducing the BOE budget. Remember, keep it clean. It's about the kids....While the City Council has no control over the line items the Board budgets, the bottom line is decided there. If the ideas are viable, I'll make sure the BOE hears about them. The Finance Committee, too.

Budget Cutting

"No government can exist without taxation. This money must necessarily be levied on the people; and the grand art consists of levying so as not to oppress.''
Frederick the Great

The Finance Committee is starting to tred through the City Manager's budget, and the BOE gave their presentation last week. Over the next several weeks, other large departments (e.g., police/fire, public works and parks&rec) will also undergo the Committee's scrutiny.

I read the letters to the editor of the RJ, and hear from people on the street that we need to cut spending. I'd like to hear the ideas of where the City could cut. What services, what positions can be eliminated without affecting the City's quality of life. For the time being, let's leave the BOE's budget as a separate discussion. I know it's a big target, but for discussion's purposes, let's focus on the City's expensed for now. Try to be as specific and constructive as possible. Broadbrushed statements like "Cut everything by 10%" isn't realistic. I really would like to read proposals I can bring before the Committee for serious review and consideration. Suggest away...

Sports Complex 3/23

Last night's Finance meeting was a 4 1/2 hour affair where the main topic was kids. For the first hour, the Committee listened to the Board of Ed's presentation on their $96 million request for funds to teach Meriden's children. That's a lot of money for readin', writin', and 'rithmetic, but the schools of today are charged with so much more that the days of the one-room school. The committee grilled the BOE (which crafted their budget this year as a committee of the whole) on several line items that showed significant increases over last year. We were also advised that unexpected cuts from the Federal government in key grants, as well as uncertainty over the final state grant through ECS, already has the Board preparing for program cuts that will not please parents. No Child Left Behind was also discussed, especially as to its impact on the budget. No one disagreed with NCLB's main premise, but the lack of funding by the Feds to support the required (and detested) testing requires taking money from other critical educational line items. Tuitions for students who go out of District (this includes Edison Middle School, vo-ag students, and approximately 140+ with unique special education requirements that cannot be provided in the City) topped $10 million. A brief dialogue on the perennial BOE vehicles took place, with the Mayor and Board President Frank Kogut agreeing to sit together for a more detailed talk. The City Manager's budget cuts the BOE's request to $94+ million. The Finance Committee will work this number even more.

The next major agenda item was the proposed Falcon Field turfed complex. Representatives from Wethersfield High and Central CT State University, both institutions with turfed fields, gave an overview of how the fields are constructed, maintained, and what they've done for their respective programs. Again, from my perspective the financial analysis, as well as parking, traffic and neighborhoo impact, was of most interest. I've asked the Finance Director to prepare a more detailed pro forma for the Council to see before it votes on the Committee report. The annual cost to the City will be approximately $120,000 over the next 15 years, plus maintenance, where there will be significant savings against today's program. The committee unanimously approved the project with an amendment I proposed: that this project would be applied against the City's self-imposed bonding cap, regardless if we could exempt it according to state guidelines. This means that the City Council will have to make harder choices on other spending priorities that are generally bonded (street paving, sidewalks, equipment purchases, building maintainance, etc). Nevertheless, the proposal since it was first introduced as a function the state grant procured by Senator Gaffey has undergone a tremendous amount of research, scrutiny and debate. I imagine some people will be surprised by Brian Kogut's and my vote in favor, but our concerns were met.

Our final item was the Capital Improvement Plan, where we earmarked $20,000 to provide seed money for the Hubbard Park Playscape Committee, who are raising funds to provide a new, safer, and handicap-accessible playscape in our jewel park.

This was a long post, but it was a long meeting. Over $98 million on the table considered for Meriden's kids. You can't say we don't care.

Do you support a new sports center at Falcon Field for an additional cost of $2 million?
	Yes
	No
	Yes, if my taxes are unaffected
	Need more info
	No opinion
Free polls from Pollhost.com

More on Meriden Planning

This afternoon the third meeting of the committee working on the updating of the City's Plan of Conservation and Development (aka "Master Plan") took place. Two major items were on the agenda: the first was agreeing on a vision statement which, after review from last meeting's input by the members and some discussion on the desired residential population growth over the next 20 years, was accepted. As soon as I get the final draft from planning staff, I will post here. The second was an extremely interesting and informative presentation from C. James Gibbons, a UConn professor at the Center for Land Use Education and Research (CLEAR). (A good use of our state tax dollars...no charge for this presentation and Jim's formidable knowledge. Factoid: he's a Meriden native!). The committee arranged to have his presentation videotaped for public viewing on the cable access channel. I urge you to watch it. Jim gave a great overview on what the planning process should consider, including the statutory requirements that all towns and cities are under to meet. One point he kept returning to was that public input is critical. Another was that the local officials, not the consultant, should be prepared to educate the public on the plan as it evolves. Be assured that both these elements will be adhered to in the process.

Jim also shared some of the work CLEAR is doing, and pointed us to their website, www.clear.uconn.edu. One particularly interesting slide dealt with land cover. For instance, it shows that since 1985, with all the development that took place through 2002, 25% of Meriden is still forested. Granted, it's a drop from 28% 20 years ago, but it's illuminating. It points to the type of resource information the City must catalog and understand before we finalize our Master Plan.

The next step is to hire a consultant that will help guide the committee in its work. This is planned by May. The whole process will take 1 to 2 years, but I think Meriden is well on its way. For more information, please contact the City Planner, Dominick Caruso at City Hall. His number is 630-4081. And watch the presentation by Jim Gibbons if you get a chance.

Meriden Planning

There's been an interesting discussion thread developing in the Comments to the "State Tax Cuts" post from a couple weeks ago. A couple posters have given opinions on how planning for economic development has been less than desirable in the recent, and not so recent past. This is an important topic, as the City must do a better job in attracting and retaining businesses in order to expand the tax base and reduce pressure on current commercial and residential property taxpayers. While we all await for true property tax reform (whatever that means!), we must be more strategic about using the resources we have at hand. That means land, (whether developable or re-developable), labor, incentives, and most important, leadership.

There has been some long-term planning to overcome obstacles to economic development, most visibly in flood control and downtown revitalization (CIty Center Initiative). A significant effort is currently under way under the auspices of the Planning Commission, which is updating the City's Master Plan of Conservation and Development. Chairman Rico Bucilli is directing a committee made up of representatives from the City Council (myself and Brian Kogut), the Planning Commission, the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Conservation Commission, Inlands and Wetlands Commissions among others. They meet monthly (next meeting, tomorrow, 3/21) and will over the next year prepare an updated plan to guide the City's development into the 21st century. There will be ample opportunity for the public's review and input. I will do my best to update you here, but feel free to attend the meetings, which are public.

What would be your priorities as this plan evolves?

Public Hearing: Sports Complex 3/13

The public hearing called by Public Works and Parks and Rec Committee Chairman Councilor Mike Rohde was held this evening at Washington Middle School. Nine city councilors listened to over 60 people express their opinions on the proposal, virtually all in favor, with many more supporting through applause and cheers. Only one speaker, who noted that dissent is what makes America strong, gave a quiet but well-measured response as to why he was opposed, and felt money should go to higher educational priorities which benefit more children in the long run. Two others, Arlene Dunlop and Andy Piatek, regular critics of Council spending at Council public comment sessions, were surprisingly non-committal on the idea, although borderline opposed. I was clearly expecting more opposition from them.

I was impressed by the respect of the public for all speakers, however. Even though the room was mostly filled with supporters, they listened quietly and applauded politely when the lone dissenter spoke, as well as when Arlene and Andy finished. It made me proud of our citizens, and was a far cry from some involved in the debate on the proposed zone regulation change around the Saab Scania site last year, who catcalled and yelled over recognized speakers who opposed their position against the zone regulation change. And while I wished there were more to be heard from those with concerns on the sports complex, because it helps decision-making when you hear all sides, I congratulate the organizers of the presentations tonight. People did their homework, and a lot of the youth (mostly Platt football players, but some younger ones as well) got their first taste of public speaking, and I hope they see what it takes to get involved in their community. (The cheers for the young Meriden Raiders were the loudest!) As we hear time and again, they are our future.

I was interested in the two proposals around the funding side of this issue, which is very important to me. Former mayor Joe Marinan suggested dedicating part of the annual Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) which the City authorized each year to the tune of about $7.5 million on average. He said we should work within this spending pool, but buy less dump trucks or other priorities funded with this money (for example, building upgrades and maintenance, street and sidewalk repair are often funded within the CIP). Jim Fredericks calculated that it would only cost pennies a day for annual principal and interest payments assessed to the 17,786 taxable properties (not including commercial) in the City. That may be true, but when added to the pennies a day for everything else that makes up our $175 million annual budget, those pennies can break a bank. But it was a creative way of overcoming the objection regarding cost. (And by the way, Jim, I caught the West Point reference.) Andy Piatek suggested soliciting 1,000 citizens for $1,000 a piece, and offer a tax break in return. Not sure that's workable, but again, it was nice to see a few people thinking about the cost issue.

The hearing concluded after nearly 3 hours, with the Public Works committee going into session. I left at that point, as I will be awaiting their recommendation to the full Council before it comes to Finance, which will have to consider the cost issue in earnest if the Council supports the project. As a few speakers noted, it is not an easy decision to make, but we're elected to make it. The public hearing was successful in that it gave the public an open opportunity to tell its representatives what they wanted. Tonight they clearly wanted a sports complex. We will need to decide soon because of the deadline for the grant. We will decide, soon.

Non Profits and You

During our last council meeting we were faced with two resolutions to provide additional funding to the Meriden Raiders and Salvation Army. There was quite a debate. Contrary to some opinions, we don't settle these things in caucus. The discussion revolved around whether we should provide non-profit agencies additional funding after they have received monies through CDBG grants (this is money we recieve from the Feds). I am interested in your thoughts as we will be faced with more and more of these requests in the future.

Budget 06-07

" People who complain about taxes can be divided into two classes: men and women." ~Author Unknown

The City Manager delivered his budget message to the City Council this week. Brian Kogut, the Finance Committee chairman, has scheduled several budget hearings for key departments to present their budgets for consideration. These departments include the Board of Education, whose budget makes up more than half of the total; police and fire; and public works. The submitted budget equals a little more than $175 million, almost $6 1/2 million more than the current budget ending June 2006. This represents a 3.82% increase, and would cause our tax rate to rise by 2.35 mills. According to the City Manager, this means the tax increase on a median priced home in Meriden would be almost $20 a month, or $235 for the year. Critical cost drivers are no surprise: escalating employee benefits expense, especially in health care, and also required pension contributions; energy costs; and educational costs for our schools.

And although economic development has been healthy, and our grand list rose by almost 2%, the revenues expected are offset by less than average additional revenues from the State proposed by the Governor. Federal revenue which passed through the state to the City is also declining. The City Manager and his staff nevertheless propose a budget with little flexibility for cuts if the City wishes to maintain current services. It will be the job of the Finance Committee to see if the proposed increase can be reduced even further. The challenge every year grows harder. I invite members of the public to share their thoughts on what services could be reduced or eliminated without harming the quality of life severely in Meriden. I also would like suggestions on improving revenue, especially in terms of economic development. Feel free to share here, or come to the budget hearings. The dates can be obtained by calling the City Council's office at 630-4125 during business hours, or checking the public meeting calendar on the City Website.

Week in Review

The first week of this new blog is now over, and I'm very pleased with the response it has generated. We've had over 300 visitors, and obviously a number have posted comments to topics of interest to them. And I've only had to delete one that got out of hand in the beginning of the week. I congratulate and thank anyone who's posted, either anonymously or not. Your viewpoints have been enlightening, and I'm sure they're being read by a number of policy makers, both on the city and state level.

The hottest topic has been the sports complex. It's unfortunate the weather forestalled last night's public hearing, but in the interest of safety, it was the right thing to do to reschedule. I hope there will be a wealth of information available when the public is heard on March 13 (5:30, Washington Middle School. It will be videotaped.).

On Monday, the City Council meets for its bi-monthly meeting. Of particular note is that the council will take a final vote on the Charter Revision Commission Report. Personally, I will be supporting the commission's recommendation on the proposed referendum on significantly large city expenditures, the sole item they were charged with by the Council to investigate as a result of a petition last year. I'll also support the technical corrections to the Charter they recommend, as well as a loophole regarding Board appointments. I will be interested in the discussion on the balance of the recommendations by the rest of the Council, but I believe the Public Comment process is satisfactory as it stands. City Council rules allow that to change with a 2/3 vote without resorting to changing the Charter, and I'm comfortable with that.

The City Manager will also present his budget message to the Council, which will be referred to the Finance Committee for deliberation over the next couple months. I've seen a draft, and I believe Larry Kendzior and his staff worked hard to put a difficult budget together for the Council's consideration. There will be budget hearings scheduled by Brian Kogut, Finance Chair, and a public hearing, before it is accepted and a mill rate is voted on in May.

Also, it's my understanding that the Mayor had requested Ross Gulino to resign his recently appointed seat on the Planning Commission, and Ross acquiesced. The mayor has placed Art Geary's name on the agenda for approval Monday. I respect Ross' decision, but I'm sorry he will leave the Commission before he had a chance to offer his experience. He's already done good things in the City, and I hope he continues to be active in making Meriden better.

I think a lot was learned over the past couple weeks about the appointment process. I hope to discuss this more here in the future.

Thanks again for your interest in "Meriden City Council Talk." I look forward to hearing from all of you (and more) as we go on.

Public Hearing on Sports Complex Postponed

Due to weather conditions, the public hearing scheduled for this evening has been postponed until March 13, 5:30 p.m. at Washington Middle School.

State Tax Cuts

The legislature is currently debating Governor Rell's proposed car tax elimination and property tax credit cut (see "Rell Bid to Drop Cart Tax Hits Rut" in today's Hartford Courant). We are beginning to analyze the potential impact on our budget planning in Meriden, not only for now, but future years. I know our state delegation has been reading this blog, I'm sure they'd be interested in this forum's feedback.

What do you think about the state tax cut proposals?

Ground Rules

Well, as I said in my initial post, I will be learning as we go along. The intent of this effort is to provide an open forum for information and an exchange of opinions on issues of interest to the citizens of Meriden.

I hope when information is posted here, the facts are accurate. But if they're not, or need clarification, I expect feedback that will correct any errors. Opinions, however, are subjective, and I look for them to be free-ranging, conflicting and controversial at times, supported or attacted depending on a writer's personal point of view. That's the point of this blog.

What will be unwelcome, however, are personal attacks and profanity. These are not allowed on the council floor and in fact are ruled out of order. Speakers, whether councilors or the public, are refrained from such action. That will happen here. Facts can be challenged, opinions can be debated heatedly. But personal name-calling or attacks, and profanity, will not be allowed. I hope this forum can be respectful of contributors, and keep out of the gutter. Let's be considerate of each other, OK? You can still get your point across.

Public Hearing: Sports Complex

On Thursday, March 2, there will be a public hearing at Washington Middle School, chaired by Public Works and Parks/Rec Committee Chairman, Councilor Mike Rohde. The topic involves a resolution to support the construction of a new sports complex at Falcon Field, prompted by a $2 million grant procurred through the State by State Senator Tom Gaffey. This grant is contingent upon a matching $2 million grant from the City.

Lobbying has begun in earnest, with letters to the editor running in support of the measure. I have heard both support and opposition from "man on the street" surveys, both solicited and unsolicited, as well as emails. The opposition is primarily, "The City can't afford it, I can't afford the taxes now." I'm sure other councilors have heard the same. (I've created an informal poll in the sidebar. While not scientific, it will give you a chance to give an opinion and view what other readers have said.).

I urge all interested parties, both for and against, or those who just want to hear opinions, to attend. This is a great time to be heard in person. Unfortunately, I will not be present due to business travel outside the state. But I have requested that the hearing be taped for viewing on the public channel, so others can see and hear for themselves as well. I will be watching it, as it will help me decide my vote when the time comes.

Let's talk about this...

"There will always be dissident voices heard in the land expressing opposition without alternatives, finding fault but never favor, perceiving gloom on every side, and seeking influence without responsibility."

John F. Kennedy, Speech for the Dallas Trade Mart which was never delivered.
US Democratic politician (1917 - 1963)

Bear with me. I'm new at this fairly new but rapidly growing form of intercommunication, so this effort may seem choppy and erratic at times. But I thought it would be interesting to set up yet another way to talk to and hear from Meriden's citizens. Council members are an accessible lot, despite what some folks say. I usually bristle when I hear a vocal minority say that we're difficult to approach, and unresponsive. We're members of the Meriden community, just like everyone else. We shop at local markets, go to local movies, eat at local restaurants, sit at ballfields, buy gas at the corner station...and invariably someone will come up and start up a conversation about something they've read in the R-J, or saw on the Council meeting broadcast. I can't speak on behalf of my colleagues, but I would bet they're like me, and listen to the comments or questions, and take note of complaints or suggestions. That's how we got elected, and that's how we learn what's going on in the City, most times.

However, maybe it's not that easy to start a conversation, or come to a Council or Committee meeting at City Hall, or just call a Councilor at home. I've seen an increase in email traffic, which is good. But it isn't an easy experience to observe, or share with others. So I thought I'd try this blog.

Time permitting, I will try to post issues the Council is facing, or considering. I'll also ask questions, and hope I get good answers. I'll also try to give a perspective on how resolutions are developed, debated and voted upon. Granted, these will be from my point of view, but this blog will allow comments to be posted that can carry the dialogue forth. And I hope I get suggestions on how to make this blog better. Maybe we'll all learn something, and make Meriden better. Which is what this is all about.

It's a pity that President Kennedy was unable to deliver the quote above on that fateful November day in Dallas. I would like to have heard his challenge on how to handle those voices. Perhaps this blog is one way. Let's begin.

If your City Council accomplished only one thing in 2006, what would you like it to be? (for those new to blogging, just hit the "comments" link below to post a response.).